[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1232199169.7016.12.camel@thinkpad>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:32:49 +0100
From: Tim Blechmann <tim@...ngt.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, oprofile-list@...ts.sf.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
hm, it seems a bit more complicated than i originally thought.
trying to reconstruct commit b99170288421c79f0c2efa8b33e26e65f4bb7fb8, i
found, that resetting counter_width in ppro_setup_ctrs, causes the
issue. reverting part of the patch, resolved the issue:
--- a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
+++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
@@ -79,8 +79,8 @@ static void ppro_setup_ctrs(struct op_msrs const * const msrs)
if (cpu_has_arch_perfmon) {
union cpuid10_eax eax;
eax.full = cpuid_eax(0xa);
- if (counter_width < eax.split.bit_width)
- counter_width = eax.split.bit_width;
+// if (counter_width < eax.split.bit_width)
+// counter_width = eax.split.bit_width;
}
/* clear all counters */
however, trying to apply this patch to 2.6.28, the behavior is the same
as before (one NMI) ... so possibly, it is a combination of two bugs,
with similar symptoms ...
hth, tim
--
tim@...ngt.org
http://tim.klingt.org
Your mind will answer most questions if you learn to relax and wait
for the answer.
William S. Burroughs
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists