[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090117101501.GA2682@ioremap.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:15:01 +0300
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To: Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] Deferred batching of dput()
Hi Mike.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 06:29:42PM -0800, Mike Waychison (mikew@...gle.com) wrote:
> +static void postpone_dput(struct dentry *dentry)
> +{
> + struct postponed_dentries *ppd, *new_ppd;
> +
> +again:
> + ppd = get_cpu_var(postponed_dentries);
> + if (!pending_dput_full(ppd)) {
> + add_pending_dput(ppd, dentry);
> + put_cpu_var(postponed_dentries);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* need to flush out existing pending dentries. */
> + put_cpu_var(postponed_dentries);
> + /* Allocate more space.. */
> + new_ppd = new_postponed_dentries();
> + if (!new_ppd) {
> + /* Take the slow path, memory is low */
> + struct postponed_dentries_onstack ppd_onstack;
> + struct postponed_dentries *ppd;
> +
> + ppd = init_ppd_onstack(&ppd_onstack);
> + add_pending_dput(ppd, dentry);
> + process_postponed_dentries(ppd);
> + return;
> + }
Why don't you want just to put the dentry in the lowmem condition?
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists