[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090117101809.GB2682@ioremap.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:18:09 +0300
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To: Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/8] Deferred batching of iput()
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 06:29:52PM -0800, Mike Waychison (mikew@...gle.com) wrote:
> +static void postpone_iput(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> + struct postponed_inodes *ppi, *new_ppi;
> +
> +again:
> + ppi = get_cpu_var(postponed_inodes);
> + if (!pending_iput_full(ppi)) {
> + add_pending_iput(ppi, inode);
> + put_cpu_var(postponed_inodes);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* Need to flush out existing pending inodes */
> + put_cpu_var(postponed_inodes);
> + /* Allocate more space.. */
> + new_ppi = new_postponed_inodes();
> + if (!new_ppi) {
> + struct postponed_inodes_onstack ppi_onstack;
> +
> + ppi = init_ppi_onstack(&ppi_onstack);
> + add_pending_iput(ppi, inode);
> + process_postponed_inodes(ppi);
> + return;
> + }
The same here: what just not to call a real_iput() without on-stack
allocation and the line?
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists