[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49739BFA.4030609@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:15:38 +0300
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
CC: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
Steve Brokenshire <sbrokenshire@...tia.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Compress kernel modules on installation.
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:04:16 +0100
> Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
[]
>> Can I ask you to redo this patch.
>> I want a way to swith off compression, but it should default be
>> enable. So if KBUILD_MODULE_NOCOMPRESS is undefined we will compress
>> the modules when we install them.
>
> especially since the decompression is an option for the module tools,
> it should be an option for the kernel...
> since it does add a dependency for the module tools (and one that you
> might not need; for example I disabled it just to remove a build
> requires)
By the way, I for one use busybox for initramfs stuff, since a long
time ago. And it (still?) does not support decompression of kernel
modules, as of the latest (1.13) version... I don't think I'm alone
using busybox this way, and it looks like decompression support
should be added to it first, and next to the kernel.. ;)
/mjt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists