[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.0901182217320.30423@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:18:03 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Steve Brokenshire <sbrokenshire@...tia.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Compress kernel modules on installation.
On Sunday 2009-01-18 22:15, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:04:16 +0100
>> Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
>[]
>>> Can I ask you to redo this patch.
>>> I want a way to swith off compression, but it should default be
>>> enable. So if KBUILD_MODULE_NOCOMPRESS is undefined we will compress
>>> the modules when we install them.
>>
>> especially since the decompression is an option for the module tools,
>> it should be an option for the kernel...
>> since it does add a dependency for the module tools (and one that you
>> might not need; for example I disabled it just to remove a build
>> requires)
>
>By the way, I for one use busybox for initramfs stuff, since a long
>time ago. And it (still?) does not support decompression of kernel
>modules, as of the latest (1.13) version... I don't think I'm alone
>using busybox this way, and it looks like decompression support
>should be added to it first, and next to the kernel.. ;)
If we went by that metric, the kernel would still be in its infancy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists