linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/17] x86-64: Convert irqstacks to per-cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4972B967.4010606@kernel.org>
Date:	Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:08:55 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/17] x86-64: Convert irqstacks to per-cpu

Hello,

Brian Gerst wrote:
>> Also, as pda field name, irqstackptr might be fine but wouldn't it be
>> better to rename it to at least irq_stack_ptr as this change requires
>> touching every users anyway?
> 
> I kept the same name unless it would conflict with something.  If you
> want to rename it, it should be a separate patch.

Sure, that's an option too but it might as well be done when making
those percpu variables.  I don't really see why those two changes
should be separate.  There isn't any reason why they shouldn't be
separate either but if you're already mucking around every user...

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/