[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73c1f2160901172120i174a8933qfdb51e654f13c785@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 00:20:45 -0500
From: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/17] x86-64: Remove pda_init()
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Brian Gerst wrote:
>> -void __cpuinit pda_init(int cpu)
>> -{
>> - struct x8664_pda *pda = cpu_pda(cpu);
>> -
>> - /* Setup up data that may be needed in __get_free_pages early */
>> - loadsegment(fs, 0);
>> - loadsegment(gs, 0);
>> -
>> - load_pda_offset(cpu);
>> -}
>
> Simply removing these should work fine as they're also initialized in
> other places earlier but I think they still need to be in cpu_init()
> because...
>
> /*
> * cpu_init() initializes state that is per-CPU. Some data is already
> * initialized (naturally) in the bootstrap process, such as the GDT
> * and IDT. We reload them nevertheless, this function acts as a
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> * 'CPU state barrier', nothing should get across.
> * A lot of state is already set up in PDA init for 64 bit
> */
That comment seems like overkill. It may have been relevant in an
earlier time, but I don't think we need to be so strict now,
especially for things we know are set properly in head_xx.S.
--
Brian Gerst
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists