[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090119113530.GA13185@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:35:30 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET x86:core/percpu] percpu: move PDA fields to percpu
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello, Ingo, Brian.
> >
> > Brian Gerst wrote:
> > >
> > > Here are the remaining patches rebased on top of these.
> >
> > Ingo, here's git tree for kill-pda patches.
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git tj-percpu
> >
> > I dropped early irq_stack_ptr relocation from 0004. I'll post updated
> > patch as reply to the original patch. If you think it's still
> > necessary, please feel free to discuss it. I also added a patch to kill
> > PERCPU_VADDR_PREALLOC(). Will post the patch as a reply to 0005.
>
> Pulled these commit into tip/core/percpu:
hm, actually - the stackprotector impact is getting quite nasty. So i
think we are better off by merging the stackprotector fixes into
core/percpu, and then rebasing these commits on top of that. I pushed out
a new core/percpu branch with that done - and stackprotector works in that
lineup.
Would you mind to redo these commits on top of that? I tried the conflict
resolution but it looks quite complex and non-obvious - it would be
cleaner to have it this way.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists