[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4974838F.4020606@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:43:43 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET x86:core/percpu] percpu: move PDA fields to percpu
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
>> * Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello, Ingo, Brian.
>>>
>>> Brian Gerst wrote:
>>>> Here are the remaining patches rebased on top of these.
>>> Ingo, here's git tree for kill-pda patches.
>>>
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git tj-percpu
>>>
>>> I dropped early irq_stack_ptr relocation from 0004. I'll post updated
>>> patch as reply to the original patch. If you think it's still
>>> necessary, please feel free to discuss it. I also added a patch to kill
>>> PERCPU_VADDR_PREALLOC(). Will post the patch as a reply to 0005.
>> Pulled these commit into tip/core/percpu:
>
> hm, actually - the stackprotector impact is getting quite nasty. So i
> think we are better off by merging the stackprotector fixes into
> core/percpu, and then rebasing these commits on top of that. I pushed out
> a new core/percpu branch with that done - and stackprotector works in that
> lineup.
>
> Would you mind to redo these commits on top of that? I tried the conflict
> resolution but it looks quite complex and non-obvious - it would be
> cleaner to have it this way.
Sure, will rebase and repost.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists