[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4974FDAE.7080909@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:24:46 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
CC: Avuton Olrich <avuton@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: Fail to early boot with v2.6.27-rc2 to at least v2.6.29-rc2 due
to dc1e35c
Suresh Siddha wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 02:07:36PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Suresh Siddha wrote:
>>> Also, I wonder, if we should complain/scream during boot if we find only
>>> fewer cpuid levels on modern generation cpu's.
>>>
>> We should, or if this block is reversible, we should probably just undo
>> it (the reason people put this block in places is because of, ahem,
>> inferior operating systems having bugs.)
>>
>> Do you know how this is managed? Via an MSR?
>
> IA32_MISC_ENABLE MSR bit 22
LOL, the official name of this bit is "IA32_MISC_ENABLES.BOOT_NT4"; kind
of says it all. In fact, I remember the problems we had with NT4 and
CPUID back from the Transmeta days, and there, too, we ended up with a
CPUID hack which Linux unconditionally disables.
I'll write up a patch.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists