[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <85492.1232422525@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:35:25 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: Avuton Olrich <avuton@...il.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: Fail to early boot with v2.6.27-rc2 to at least v2.6.29-rc2 due to dc1e35c
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:57:36 PST, Suresh Siddha said:
> Though the bios is the culprit and this option will severely limit
> the cpu capabilities that OS can take advantage of, OS should fallback
> to a safer mode. I will have a patch for it.
>
> Also, I wonder, if we should complain/scream during boot if we find only
> fewer cpuid levels on modern generation cpu's.
I think a KERN_INFO "Core2 E9700 expected 6 cpuid levels, got 4"
would possibly be a good idea.
Might be a good idea to check what happens under VMWare and similar though, it
looks like the type of thing a hypervisor is likely to do something odd to us...
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists