[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090120092522.GC2576@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:34:55 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@....de>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Warning and BUG with btrfs and corrupted image
Hi!
> > > > Thanks for looking at things
> > > >
> > > > Aside from catching checksumming errors, we're not quite ready for
> > > > fuzzer style attacks. The code will be hardened for this but it isn't
> > > > yet.
> > >
> > > Does this mean i should stop trying to break it for now or are you interested
> > > in further reports?
> >
> > Does ext2/3 and vfat survive that kind of attacks? Those are 'in
> > production' and should survive it...
>
> I regularly (once or twice a week) test 100 corrupted images of
> vfat, udf, msdos, swap, iso9660, ext2, ext3, ext4, minix, bfs, befs,
> hfs, hfs+, qnx4, affs and cramfs on each of my two test machines.
>
> They are all pretty stable, one remaining thing on my list i didnt have
> time to look into was an issue with fat (msdos) triggering a bug in
> buffer.c the other is a warning with ext4 in jbd2/checkpoint.c:166
Good, I did not expect filesystems to be in so good state. Thanks!
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists