[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090120101119.GB10158@disturbed>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:11:19 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@....de>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Warning and BUG with btrfs and corrupted image
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:31:50AM +0100, Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
> * Pavel Machek (pavel@...e.cz) wrote:
> > Does ext2/3 and vfat survive that kind of attacks? Those are 'in
> > production' and should survive it...
>
> I regularly (once or twice a week) test 100 corrupted images of
> vfat, udf, msdos, swap, iso9660, ext2, ext3, ext4, minix, bfs, befs,
> hfs, hfs+, qnx4, affs and cramfs on each of my two test machines.
Any reason you are not testing XFS in that set?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists