[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090120101503.GC17377@alice>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:15:03 +0100
From: Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@....de>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Warning and BUG with btrfs and corrupted image
* Dave Chinner (david@...morbit.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:31:50AM +0100, Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
> > * Pavel Machek (pavel@...e.cz) wrote:
> > > Does ext2/3 and vfat survive that kind of attacks? Those are 'in
> > > production' and should survive it...
> >
> > I regularly (once or twice a week) test 100 corrupted images of
> > vfat, udf, msdos, swap, iso9660, ext2, ext3, ext4, minix, bfs, befs,
> > hfs, hfs+, qnx4, affs and cramfs on each of my two test machines.
>
> Any reason you are not testing XFS in that set?
So far the responses from xfs folks have been disappointing, if you are
interested in bugreports i can send you some.
Greetings, Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists