[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49762F07.1050404@google.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:07:35 -0800
From: Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/8] Deferred batching of iput()
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 06:29:52PM -0800, Mike Waychison (mikew@...gle.com) wrote:
>> +static void postpone_iput(struct inode *inode)
>> +{
>> + struct postponed_inodes *ppi, *new_ppi;
>> +
>> +again:
>> + ppi = get_cpu_var(postponed_inodes);
>> + if (!pending_iput_full(ppi)) {
>> + add_pending_iput(ppi, inode);
>> + put_cpu_var(postponed_inodes);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Need to flush out existing pending inodes */
>> + put_cpu_var(postponed_inodes);
>> + /* Allocate more space.. */
>> + new_ppi = new_postponed_inodes();
>> + if (!new_ppi) {
>> + struct postponed_inodes_onstack ppi_onstack;
>> +
>> + ppi = init_ppi_onstack(&ppi_onstack);
>> + add_pending_iput(ppi, inode);
>> + process_postponed_inodes(ppi);
>> + return;
>> + }
>
> The same here: what just not to call a real_iput() without on-stack
> allocation and the line?
>
Agreed. Will fix in the next version.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists