[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200901222009.43342.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:09:43 +0100
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>,
Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HVC: do not request the irq twice.
Am Thursday 22 January 2009 18:56:08 schrieb Ian Campbell:
> --- a/drivers/char/hvc_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/hvc_irq.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,10 @@ int notifier_add_irq(struct hvc_struct *hp, int irq)
> hp->irq_requested = 0;
> return 0;
> }
> +
> + if (hp->irq_requested)
> + return 0;
> +
> rc = request_irq(irq, hvc_handle_interrupt, IRQF_DISABLED,
> "hvc_console", hp);
> if (!rc)
Unfortunately I have no system with an irq based hvc console - I cannot test
this patch. Anyway, the patch looks sane:
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
If this really fixes a problem, I am asking myself, if notifier_del can be
called several times as well. If yes, it might be better to call free_irq at
the last notifier_del - which means we need proper refcounting. Otherwise the
console switches into polling mode....
Christian, blaming Rusty for using hvc_console in virtio_console which made me
somehow responsible for this code... ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists