[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b0438a630901212342o543ed522p60376f764b6248b5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:42:28 +0100
From: Miguel Ángel Álvarez <gotzoncabanes@...il.com>
To: Karl Hiramoto <karl@...amoto.org>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: IXP4XX queues
Hi
Last December we talked about 64 queues and IXP4XX. Karl has a patch
for them, and although I think it could be better to splitt it into
two different ones ("plain 64 queue expansion" for which I proposed a
modified patch based on Karl's, and "debugging and other things"), I
prefer Karl's to none.
What do you think of this? Which should be the best way to include it
in the main stream kernel?
Thanks
Miguel Ángel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists