[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090122081101.GA32212@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:11:01 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: yinghai@...nel.org, mpm@...enic.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sparc64 build breakage...
* David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:15:53 -0800 (PST)
>
> >
> > This change:
> >
> > commit d7e51e66899f95dabc89b4d4c6674a6e50fa37fc
> > Author: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> > Date: Wed Jan 7 15:03:13 2009 -0800
> >
> > sparseirq: make some func to be used with genirq
> >
> > breaks the sparc64 build:
> ..
> > This should fix it:
> >
> > sparc64: Fix build by using kstat_irqs_cpu().
>
> And here is a mix for the next failure.
Applied your fixes to tip/irq/sparseirq:
e81838d: sparc64: Fix build by using kstat_irqs_cpu()
623d3f0: sparc64: Fix build by including linux/irq.h into time_64.c
thanks David!
> But really, either linux/kernel_stat.h provides the
> kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu interface or linux/irq.h does, not both.
Yes, but every time someone tries to clean those dependencies up, it gets
held up by non-genirq architectures:
/*
* Please do not include this file in generic code. There is currently
* no requirement for any architecture to implement anything held
* within this file.
*
* Thanks. --rmk
*/
Meanwhile that particular comment is moot because ARM is genirq - but
there's a handful of other non-genirq architectures so this area of code
continues to be a mess.
I guess we could move all the APIs to kernel_stat.h. Yinghai?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists