[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090124185612.5afddbb0@mjolnir.drzeus.cx>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 18:56:12 +0100
From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mmc: add MODALIAS linkage for MMC/SD devices
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:00:03 +0000
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> Would it make more sense to simply use mmc: with no data as the MODALIAS
> tag here. And make mmc-block have mmc:* as an alias. That way the
> actual (useless) numeric data is not exposed but we still will load the
> mmc-block module for everything exactly as we do with the udev rule.
> This should still make things work from a distro point of view and not
> expose anything which might then get relied on. If we do it so extra
> data can still be added later we won't prevent sane data being exposed
> should we ever have any.
>
> If you are happier with that I can re-spin the patches that way?
>
Well, as long as we're on the track of temporary hack, we might as well
just export "mmc_block" as the modalias. Or would there be any
side-effects to that?
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
encryption.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists