[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac3eb2510901241545l4eb9f77dvebd5861340b3447e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:45:46 +0100
From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
To: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mmc: add MODALIAS linkage for MMC/SD devices
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 18:56, Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:00:03 +0000
> Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Would it make more sense to simply use mmc: with no data as the MODALIAS
>> tag here. And make mmc-block have mmc:* as an alias. That way the
>> actual (useless) numeric data is not exposed but we still will load the
>> mmc-block module for everything exactly as we do with the udev rule.
>> This should still make things work from a distro point of view and not
>> expose anything which might then get relied on. If we do it so extra
>> data can still be added later we won't prevent sane data being exposed
>> should we ever have any.
>>
>> If you are happier with that I can re-spin the patches that way?
>>
>
> Well, as long as we're on the track of temporary hack, we might as well
> just export "mmc_block" as the modalias. Or would there be any
> side-effects to that?
The common format is to prefix with "<subsystem>:". Something like
"mmc:block" sounds fine to me.
Thanks,
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists