[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090125164858.6b281c6c@mjolnir.drzeus.cx>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:48:58 +0100
From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mmc: add MODALIAS linkage for MMC/SD devices
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:45:46 +0100
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 18:56, Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx> wrote:
> >
> > Well, as long as we're on the track of temporary hack, we might as well
> > just export "mmc_block" as the modalias. Or would there be any
> > side-effects to that?
>
> The common format is to prefix with "<subsystem>:". Something like
> "mmc:block" sounds fine to me.
>
My point was to have the kernel explicitly ask for the module it wants
as there is no decent device to driver mapping scheme.
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
encryption.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists