[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <497E14E3.2080509@goop.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:54:11 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] x86: add pte_set_flags/clear_flags
forpteflag manipulation
Jan Beulich wrote:
> Whether a pte is live doesn't matter here: If you change P on Xen, the
> frame number representation *must* change from/to PFN to/from MFN.
> In no case (other than iomem pages) is it allowed to flip just this bit.
Yes, true. Same with _PAGE_SPECIAL, which is actually flipped by code
here. I guess a warning here might be useful, but really the calling
code needs to be properly disciplined; after all setting P on a swap
entry is no fun either.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists