[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090126195431.GC504@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:24:31 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Arve Hj?nnev?g <arve@...roid.com>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Cgroup based OOM killer controller
* Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de> [2009-01-21 16:38:21]:
> As Alan Cox suggested/wondered in this thread,
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/12/235 , this is a container group based approach
> to override the oom killer selection without losing all the benefits of the
> current oom killer heuristics and oom_adj interface.
>
> It adds a tunable oom.victim to the oom cgroup. The oom killer will kill the
> process using the usual badness value but only within the cgroup with the
> maximum value for oom.victim before killing any process from a cgroup with a
> lesser oom.victim number. Oom killing could be disabled by setting
> oom.victim=0.
Looking at the patch, I wonder if it is time for user space OOM
notifications that were discussed during the containers mini-summit.
The idea is to inform user space about OOM's and let user space take
action, if no action is taken, the default handler kicks in.
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists