[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1233101001.6717.5.camel@brick>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:03:21 -0800
From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [mingo@...e.hu: [git pull] headers_check fixes]
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 14:57 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > Should i perhaps not bother with the stuff below? Cannot turn off
> > CONFIG_HEADERS_CHECK in my builds because it can cause build failures.
> So I think it makes our headers worse. Code like
>
> > +#ifdef __KERNEL__
> > +# ifdef CONFIG_X86_BSWAP
> > +# define __X86_BSWAP
> > +# endif /* CONFIG_X86_BSWAP */
> > +#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>
> just doesn't make sense. It doesn't make sense _inside_ the kernel, and it
> doesn't make sense _outside_ it either.
>
Or just wrap all of asm/swab.h in #ifdef __KERNEL__.
Harvey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists