[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090129211505.GA10122@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:15:05 -0500
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: horms@...ge.net.au, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, miaox@...fujitsu.com,
vgoyal@...hat.com
Subject: Re: mmotm 2009-01-28-02-17 uploaded (i386 build errors: cpusets &
kexec)
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:48:59AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:27:34 -0500
> Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:01:57AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:09:35 -0500 Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > So does that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- a/kernel/printk.c~kexec-add-dmesg-log-symbols-to-proc-vmcoreinfo-lists-fix-fix
> > > > > > +++ a/kernel/printk.c
> > > > > > @@ -137,11 +137,13 @@ static char *log_buf = __log_buf;
> > > > > > static int log_buf_len = __LOG_BUF_LEN;
> > > > > > static unsigned logged_chars; /* Number of chars produced since last read+clear operation */
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
> > > > > > void log_buf_kexec_setup(void)
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(log_buf);
> > > > > > VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(log_end);
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > +#endif
> > > > > >
> > > > > > static int __init log_buf_len_setup(char *str)
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > _
> > > > >
> > > > > Weird, I thought I checked that just now. In any case this email
> > > > > was already in my inbox. In any case, I can now produce the problem,
> > > > > and this patch resolves it.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, i didn't think to check on conditions when CONFIG_KEXEC wasn't set. I
> > > > assumed we had a stub for all the VMCOREINFO defines. Why don't we fix it in
> > > > that manner? I mean we have serveral arch specific additions to vmcoreinfo, all
> > > > of which apparently must be ifdefd for this to work. Why not just fix it in
> > > > conditional definition?
> > >
> > > I didn't do that because then we'd have an empty function log_buf_kexec_setup()
> > > floating about in every vmlinux.
> > >
> > > Hardly a big issue, but a bit regrettable.
> > >
> > Won't the compiler just eliminate that symbol during final link, given that its
> > not an exported symbol?
>
> I don't think it's that smart.
>
> akpm:/home/akpm> cat t.c
>
> void foo(void)
> {
> }
>
> main()
> {
> }
> akpm:/home/akpm> gcc -O2 t.c
> akpm:/home/akpm> nm a.out|grep foo
> 08048300 T foo
>
> With -ffunction-sections or other fancy options, maybe. And it'll be
> version-dependent.
>
huh, how about that. I always thought we stripped out empty functions. Perhaps
that a later stage in most of the build processes I've used (a strip or
something later on perhaps). Anywho, I stand corrected. In light of this, its
probably best that we keep what we have, and just ifdef out the callers.
Thanks Andrew!
Neil
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists