[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49821C68.4000502@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:15:20 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
"arjan@...radead.org" <arjan@...radead.org>,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: boot hang: async vs. kexec
I (try to) do daily build/boot testing. The newly built kernel
is booted via kexec. This was working until sometime between
2.6.28 and 2.6.29-rc1, so I bisected it.*
git bisect blames this commit:
96777fe7b042e5a5d0fe5fb861fcd6cd80ef9634 is first bad commit
commit 96777fe7b042e5a5d0fe5fb861fcd6cd80ef9634
Author: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu Jan 8 09:46:31 2009 -0600
async: Don't call async_synchronize_full_special() while holding sb_lock
sync_filesystems() shouldn't be calling async_synchronize_full_special
while holding a spinlock. The second while loop in that function is the
right place for this anyway.
The new/kexec-loaded kernel hangs during initcalls. The last one that
I can see (via netconsole, might miss a few of the very last lines) is:
calling net_ns_init+0x0/0x14d @ 1
net_namespace: 1008 bytes
initcall net_ns_init+0x0/0x14d returned 0 after 0 usecs
Any ideas/suggestions?
Thanks.
*caveat: This was all done with the "don't use gcc 4.1.[01]
because it miscompiles __weak" patch reverted. Could that
be an issue/problem here? (I'm using gcc 4.1.1.)
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists