linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] atmel-ssc: fix misuse of dev_dbg when requested ssc instance is not found

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090130003501.ed47dae2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:35:01 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
	Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>,
	Huang Weiyi <weiyi.huang@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] atmel-ssc: fix misuse of dev_dbg when requested ssc
 instance is not found

On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:20:25 +0100 Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@...el.com> wrote:

> > (Suitable cc's added - this was why your patch got lost)
> > 
> 
> AFAICT the lkml is the place for the drivers/misc stuff. Should I be
> looking in another file than MAINTAINERS?

Lots of drivers aren't mentioned in MAINTAINERS.  It is pretty
important to cc the relevant maintainer if poss.  `git whatchanged' is
one way.  Or a bit of inspired guessing (atmel == Haavard, for example).

But the easy way is to cc me - I'll route the thing in the appropriate
direction.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/