[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090130085249.GB6864@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:52:49 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH E 08/14] OMAP clock: move rate recalc, propagation code up to plat-omap/clock.c
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 01:42:52AM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> I haven't looked closely at your above three patches for this, but plan to
> do so later today.
>
> Regarding provenance, the patches that I sent you were developed
> independently, for clock notifier support. Ultimately, I have no personal
> attachment as to whose patches for this go in, if all technical aspects
> are equal.
There's one bug that your version highlights in mine - the virtual mpu
clock in omap1 touches the DPLL and repropagates that rate. I've
removed that repropagation, so that needs fixing.
However, this raises a question: why is the virtual mpu clock touching
some other part of the clock tree. I wonder whether this should be
handled a different way, though the first thing that needs answering is
why we have this alias for 'arm_ck' ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists