[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13B9B4C6EF24D648824FF11BE89671620376DEC116@dlee02.ent.ti.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:23:49 -0600
From: "Woodruff, Richard" <r-woodruff2@...com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH E 08/14] OMAP clock: move rate recalc, propagation code
up to plat-omap/clock.c
> There's one bug that your version highlights in mine - the virtual mpu
> clock in omap1 touches the DPLL and repropagates that rate. I've
> removed that repropagation, so that needs fixing.
>
> However, this raises a question: why is the virtual mpu clock touching
> some other part of the clock tree. I wonder whether this should be
> handled a different way, though the first thing that needs answering is
> why we have this alias for 'arm_ck' ?
At one point in time the virtual clock allowed control for a set of clocks with some dependencies. The mpu alias provided a convenient control point.
Tukka did original omap1 in this format. I forget its exact meaning.
The original omap2 code had behavior:
- mpu-dpll had a clock node which allowed direct mpu speed control
- mpu-virt-clock allowed switching between sets that have fixed ratio dependency which were pegged to current mpu-dll speed.
* This way round_rate would allow you to discover all valid OPPs.
The first pass OMAP3 code TI did followed omap2 but it wasn't strongly bound by ratio-sets given the multiple async-dplls. Paul has taken code in a bit different direction. He can comment on current behavior here.
Regards,
Richard W.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists