linux-kernel - Re: RFC: running out of x86 boot loader IDs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <18818.19160.962399.20413@harpo.it.uu.se>
Date:	Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:33:28 +0100
From:	Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: running out of x86 boot loader IDs

H. Peter Anvin writes:
 > The 4-bit values used to hold x86 boot loader IDs are near exhaustion. 
 > As a result, I'm proposing an extension protocol and will implement it 
 > in time for the next merge window unless there are objections.
 > 
 > The proposal will be as follows:
 > 
 > - The boot loader IDs (type_of_loader >> 4) E and F will be reserved:
 > 
 > 	E - extended IDs
 > 	F - special uses
 > 
 >    F is consistent with the current use of FF for "unknown".
 > 
 > - If the boot loader ID is E, the current pad1 field at 0x226 is 
 > repurposed as an extended loader ID.  The reason to use the pad1 field 
 > is that it is present in all headers since version 2.02.  The boot 
 > loader ID will simply be: ((extended ID + 0x10) << 4) + (version), where 
 > (version) as before is (type_of_loader & 15).  This is the value which 
 > will be reported in /proc/sys/kernel/bootloader_type.
 > 
 > The biggest question is probably: is there a need/desire for an extended 
 > version field, or is four bits enough for existing bootloader needs?

Why do we need a boot loader id at all? The purpose of a boot loader,
whatever it may be, is to load the kernel according to certain protocols.
Once that's done, why would the kernel care who/what loaded it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/