[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090130130757.GB31192@yoda.jdub.homelinux.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:07:57 -0500
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Cc: avorontsov@...mvista.com, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.28-rt on PowerPC
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 06:00:43PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
>On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 00:34 +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>> Hi Steven,
>>
>> I know 2.6.28-rt isn't yet ready, but I could not resist to try
>> it anyway. ;-)
>>
>> Here are few issues and ways to solve them:
>>
>> Currently the -rt tree doesn't link for arch/powerpc:
>>
>> LD .tmp_vmlinux1
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `show_interrupts':
>> (.text+0x27bc): undefined reference to `__call_bad_lock_func'
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `show_interrupts':
>> (.text+0x28b0): undefined reference to `__call_bad_lock_func'
>> make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
>
>Thanks! I have not yet had the chance to apply any arch patches yet. I
>do plan on doing so after getting the code mostly working on x86.
>
>>
>> This can be trivially fixed:
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
>> index 838857f..cc7dd12 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
>> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ int show_interrupts(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
>>
>> if (i < NR_IRQS) {
>> desc = get_irq_desc(i);
>> - acquire_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
>> action = desc->action;
>> if (!action || !action->handler)
>> goto skip;
>> @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ int show_interrupts(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
>> seq_printf(p, ", %s", action->name);
>> seq_putc(p, '\n');
>> skip:
>> - release_lock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
>> } else if (i == NR_IRQS) {
>> #if defined(CONFIG_PPC32) && defined(CONFIG_TAU_INT)
>> if (tau_initialized){
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> While booting, this bug appears:
>>
>> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rtmutex.c:683
>> in_atomic(): 1 [00010001], irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 1, name: swapper
>> Call Trace:
>> [cf82f9a0] [c0008be8] show_stack+0x4c/0x16c (unreliable)
>> [cf82f9e0] [c001c184] __might_sleep+0xd8/0xf8
>> [cf82f9f0] [c02b7758] rt_spin_lock+0x30/0x78
>> [cf82fa00] [c001853c] ipic_mask_irq+0x3c/0xb0
>> [cf82fa20] [c0054064] handle_level_irq+0x40/0x178
>> [cf82fa40] [c00068ec] do_IRQ+0x68/0xe0
>> [cf82fa50] [c0012924] ret_from_except+0x0/0x14
>> --- Exception: 501 at internal_add_timer+0x4/0xe0
>>
>> This is trivially solved by converting arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c
>> back to spinlocks (ipic_lock).
>>
>> Assuming that converting-back is automatic, there are few other
>> chained interrupt controllers you might want to convert-back:
>>
>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/i8259.c (i8259_lock)
>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c (mpic_lock)
>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/qe_lib/qe_ic.c (qe_ic_lock)
arch/powerpc/sysdev/uic.c has spin_locks in the struct for each
UIC instance. They can be cascaded as well.
josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists