linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.28-rt on PowerPC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1233288595.18767.20.camel@pasglop>
Date:	Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:09:55 +1100
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	avorontsov@...mvista.com
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.28-rt on PowerPC


> Actually, it doesn't matter whether a controller is a root IC or
> cascaded. Just as primary handlers, chained handlers don't run in
> threads, thus spinlocks should be used, not sleeping locks.

Sounds good then.

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/