[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090130151701.GD27549@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:17:01 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
"Langsdorf, Mark" <mark.langsdorf@....com>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/powernow: fix cpus_allowed brokage when acpi=off
* Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
> On Thursday 29 January 2009 15:26:28 Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >
> > Impact: fix current->cpus_allowed overwriting.
> ...
> > caused by
> > | commit 2fdf66b491ac706657946442789ec644cc317e1a
> > | Author: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> > | Date: Wed Dec 31 18:08:47 2008 -0800
> > |
> > | cpumask: convert shared_cpu_map in acpi_processor* structs to cpumask_var_t
>
> Hi Yinghai!
>
> Indeed; Mike, that contained a bad conversion of
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c.
>
> This patch reverts the bad change (this code should still be converted
> to work_on_cpu of course, but that's a bigger change).
>
> Yinghai, as far as I can tell your other fixes are independent (and
> were a problem before this commit, yes?). Can you re-submit them on top
> of this patch (which is for Ingo, but against latest Linus).
>
> Subject: cpumask: fix powernow-k8: partial revert of 2fdf66b491ac706657946442789ec644cc317e1a
>
> Impact: fix powernow-k8 when acpi=off (or other error).
>
> There was a spurious change introduced into powernow-k8 in this patch:
> the cause if that we try to "restore" the cpus_allowed we never saved.
>
> See lkml "[PATCH] x86/powernow: fix cpus_allowed brokage when
> acpi=off" from Yinghai for the bug report.
>
> Cc: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
applied to tip/x86/urgent, thanks guys!
Dave, is it fine if we send the fix to Linus via this route - or would you
like to do it yourself?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists