linux-kernel - Re: [mingo@...e.hu: [git pull] headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:20:01 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [mingo@...e.hu: [git pull] headers_check fixes]


* Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org> wrote:

> Hello Ingo,
> 
> On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 00:31 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > Jaswider, would you mind re-doing the tree filtering out the CONFIG_* 
> > changes? I'll go over the end result once more to make sure it has no 
> > changes that make the code look worse.
> 
> Sure, why not ;-)
> 
> But in your -tip tree you already have these patches. Are you going to 
> revert them or should I make patches for linus tree.

yes, i'll replace that branch with your tree - the bad commits are 
intermixed with the good commits so reverting does not help (there would 
be way too many ugly reverts).

As long as you base your patches on Linus's -git tree i'll be able to sort 
it all out.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/