[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090130134736.ce5910aa.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:47:36 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: hch@....de, ebiederm@...ssion.com, mingo@...e.hu, xemul@...nvz.org,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, vgusev@...nvz.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] kthreads: rework kthread_stop()
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:33:58 +0100
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> int kthread_stop(struct task_struct *k)
> {
> + struct kthread *kthread;
> int ret;
>
> - mutex_lock(&kthread_stop_lock);
> -
> - /* It could exit after stop_info.k set, but before wake_up_process. */
> - get_task_struct(k);
> -
> trace_sched_kthread_stop(k);
> + get_task_struct(k);
>
> - /* Must init completion *before* thread sees kthread_stop_info.k */
> - init_completion(&kthread_stop_info.done);
> - smp_wmb();
> + kthread = to_kthread(k);
> + barrier(); /* it might have exited */
Why the change from smp_wmb() to plain old barrier()?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists