lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:54:09 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	mingo@...e.hu
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: x86's nmi_hz wrt. oprofile's nmi_timer_int.c

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:01:25 +0100

> 
> * David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> 
> > While working on an NMI watchdog implementation on sparc64 I noticed 
> > what seems to be a peculiar behavior of the NMI timer int oprofile 
> > support on x86.
> > 
> > When the NMI watchdog tests itself at boot timer we start with nmi_hz 
> > equal to HZ.
> > 
> > After the NMI watchdog self-test passes, nmi_hz is reduced down to '1'.
> > 
> > The NMI timer int oprofile support simply uses DIE_NMI notifiers for 
> > it's implementation.  But I don't see anything in the code of 
> > arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_timer_int.c nor the NMI watchdog infrastructure 
> > which will re-adjust nmi_hz back to HZ or something similar.
> > 
> > Am I missing something?
> 
> Reducing it to 1 HZ was kind of a performance hack: running NMIs at HZ 
> needlessly interrupts the CPU HZ times a second. It's more than enough to 
> have 1 nmi-watchdog tick per second to notice deadlocks that take longer 
> than 5 seconds.

For the NMI watchdog's purposes I understand the intent, and this
is perfectly fine.

The problem is that it stays at '1' when oprofile starts using the NMI
watchdog, and we certainly want more than one oprofile tick per second
:-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ