linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/2] epoll fix own poll()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0901292339480.16141@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date:	Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:41:53 -0800 (PST)
From:	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To:	Pavel Pisa <pisa@....felk.cvut.cz>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] epoll fix own poll()

On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Pavel Pisa wrote:

> epoll_wait() unconditionally calls  ep_poll(), the "rdllist" is not empty
> (cheked by previous ep_eventpoll_poll() call), so ep_send_events()
> has to be called. It moves all events from "rdllist" onto  "txlist"
> and reports events confirmed by individual poll() calls to user.
> There could be non signaling events in the "rdlist" left there from
> previous scan for level triggering events or in case, that condition
> is reset by some other intervention before  ep_eventpoll_poll().
> All this is not problem yet, it would result in one abundant call to
> epoll_wait() which returns 0. No problem. The EPOLLET events
> are moved from "rdlist", others (level triggered events) signalling
> are queued on "rdlist" again. If userspace does its duty, they would
> be removed during next call. This all seems to suggests, that one
> abundant epoll_wait() would get things back on the right path.
> All critical processing (moving between lists) seems to be under
> held of spinlock, so possibility for bugs is low. I have not yet analyzed
> overflow list which complicates things.
> 
> I am not clever enough, to see, where is the problem, that situation
> is not stabilized. Can you teach me Davide, please?

Sorry, I missed part of the email. Yes, if revents is zero in the 
send-lood, I don't see how files can be added back to the ready-list.
Please, create a very small test program that exhibit such behaviour ...



- Davide


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/