linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] devpts: Must release s

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090201163301.GD3416@lst.de>
Date:	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:33:01 +0100
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, hpa@...or.com, hch@....de,
	serue@...ibm.com, "David C. Hansen" <haveblue@...ibm.com>,
	Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sukadev@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] devpts: Must release s_umount on error

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:33:30PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> 
> From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:57:12 -0800
> Subject: [RFC][PATCH] devpts: Must release s_umount on error
> 
> We should drop the ->s_umount mutex if an error occurs after the
> sget()/grab_super() call. This was introduced when adding support
> for multiple instances of devpts and noticed during a code review/reorg.

Looks good and should probably be submitted for 2.6.29.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/