linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sungem: limit reaches -1, but 0 tested

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:59:31 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	roel.kluin@...il.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sungem: limit reaches -1, but 0 tested

From: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:42:36 +0100

> With a postfix decrement these reach -1 rather than 0,
> but after the loop it is tested to have become 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>

Just like the case just pointed out in your 'net' version
of this patch, it is being tested "<= 0" so this fix
is not necessary at all.

Please carefully review all of your changes of this kind
to make sure the test is strictly equality to zero rather
than <= 0.

I'm dropping all of these postfix decrement patches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/