[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090204081201.GB10445@ioremap.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:12:01 +0300
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
jarkao2@...il.com, dada1@...mosbay.com, ben@...s.com,
mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tcp: splice as many packets as possible at once
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 07:19:47AM +0100, Willy Tarreau (w@....eu) wrote:
> Yes myri10ge for the optimal 4080, but with e1000 too (though I don't
> remember the exact optimal value, I think it was slightly lower).
Very likely it is related to the allocator - the same allocation
overhead to get a page, but 2.5 times bigger frame.
> For the myri10ge, could this be caused by the cache footprint then ?
> I can also retry with various values between 4 and 9k, including
> values close to 8k. Maybe the fact that 4k is better than 9 is
> because we get better filling of all pages ?
>
> I also remember having used a 7 kB MTU on e1000 and dl2k in the past.
> BTW, 7k MTU on my NFS server which uses e1000 definitely stopped the
> allocation failures which were polluting the logs, so it's been running
> with that setting for years now.
Recent e1000 (e1000e) uses fragments, so it does not suffer from the
high-order allocation failures.
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists