linux-kernel - Re: cgroup mount point

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1233738981.4045.4.camel@shizuru>
Date:	Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:16:21 +0100
From:	Josselin Mouette <joss@...ian.org>
To:	debian-devel@...ts.debian.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cgroup mount point

Le mercredi 04 février 2009 à 00:38 +0100, Harald Braumann a écrit :
> So, what's the problem with /dev/cgroups then? If shm/ and pts/
> are allowed under /dev, wouldn't it be discriminating against
> cgroups/, to not allow it there?

/dev/pts contains device entries, so it sounds right to put it in /dev.
Similarly if the cgroups FS provides facilities to control some system
settings, it clearly belongs in /sys.

(/dev/shm is another story, and if you asked me, I’d have put it
in /lib/shm instead, but it’s a bit late to change it.)

-- 
 .''`.
: :' :      We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `'       We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
  `-        our own. Resistance is futile.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)