[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C5AF5A18.B6A4%dev@parallels.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:43:36 +0300
From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...allels.com>
To: Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@...il.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kirill Korotaev <dev@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix hpet timer reinit for x86_64
On 2/4/09 2:39 PM, "Vitaly Mayatskikh" <v.mayatskih@...il.com> wrote:
> At Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:40:31 +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>>
>> There's a small problem with hpet_rtc_reinit function - it checks
>> for the
>> hpet_readl(HPET_COUNTER) - hpet_t1_cmp > 0
>> to continue increasing both the HPET_T1_CMP (register) and the
>> hpet_t1_cmp (variable).
>>
>> But since the HPET_COUNTER is always 32-bit, if the hpet_t1_cmp
>> is 64-bit this condition will always be FALSE once the latter hits
>> the 32-bit boundary, and we can have a situation, when we don't
>> increase the HPET_T1_CMP register high enough.
>>
>> The result - timer stops ticking, since HPET_T1_CMP becomes less,
>> than the COUNTER and never increased again.
>>
>> The solution is to cut the upper 32-bit from the hpet_t1_cmp
>> variable to make the comparison to HPET_COUNTER correct.
>
> Why not to use u32 as a type for hpet_t1_cmp then?
> --
> wbr, Vitaly
Pavel, I agree, better please submit original fix
replacing unsigned long to unsigned int (or u32) in definition of
hpet_t1_cmp.
Thanks,
Kirill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists