[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090204134933.GC17024@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:49:33 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kirill Korotaev <dev@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix hpet timer reinit for x86_64
* Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org> wrote:
> There's a small problem with hpet_rtc_reinit function - it checks
> for the
> hpet_readl(HPET_COUNTER) - hpet_t1_cmp > 0
> to continue increasing both the HPET_T1_CMP (register) and the
> hpet_t1_cmp (variable).
>
> But since the HPET_COUNTER is always 32-bit, if the hpet_t1_cmp
> is 64-bit this condition will always be FALSE once the latter hits
> the 32-bit boundary, and we can have a situation, when we don't
> increase the HPET_T1_CMP register high enough.
>
> The result - timer stops ticking, since HPET_T1_CMP becomes less,
> than the COUNTER and never increased again.
>
> The solution is to cut the upper 32-bit from the hpet_t1_cmp
> variable to make the comparison to HPET_COUNTER correct.
>
> Reported-by: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...nvz.org>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
applied to tip/timers/urgent, thanks Pavel!
I'm wondering, what symptoms were seen due to the bug? Did system time stop,
or did it become erratic, or were there outright lockups?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists