linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090204131708.GA2739@srcf.ucam.org>
Date:	Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:17:09 +0000
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
To:	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@...il.com>,
	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, khali@...ux-fr.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources

On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 09:37:51AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:

> Len, Matthew, what is you opinion of the proposed auto setting for 
> acpi_enforce_resources, which is meant to mean strict on known problematic 
> systems and lax on others?

Personally, I'd rather that it was "strict" on everything. We might 
break some existing setups, but they're already working mostly by luck.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/