linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090204142606.1823661b@hyperion.delvare>
Date:	Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:26:06 +0100
From:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@...il.com>,
	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources

Hi Matthew,

On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:17:09 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 09:37:51AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> 
> > Len, Matthew, what is you opinion of the proposed auto setting for 
> > acpi_enforce_resources, which is meant to mean strict on known problematic 
> > systems and lax on others?
> 
> Personally, I'd rather that it was "strict" on everything. We might 
> break some existing setups, but they're already working mostly by luck.

Are you the new hwmon and i2c subsystems maintainer and I wasn't aware
of it?

-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/