[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090205135554.61488ed6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:55:54 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp,
lizf@...fujitsu.com, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [-mm patch] Show memcg information during OOM (v3)
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:46:47 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * mem_cgroup_print_mem_info: Called from OOM with tasklist_lock held in
> > + * read mode.
> > + * @memcg: The memory cgroup that went over limit
> > + * @p: Task that is going to be killed
> > + *
> > + * NOTE: @memcg and @p's mem_cgroup can be different when hierarchy is
> > + * enabled
> > + */
> > +void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct task_struct *p)
> > +{
> > + struct cgroup *task_cgrp;
> > + struct cgroup *mem_cgrp;
> > + /*
> > + * Need a buffer on stack, can't rely on allocations. The code relies
> > + * on the assumption that OOM is serialized for memory controller.
> > + * If this assumption is broken, revisit this code.
> > + */
> > + static char task_memcg_name[PATH_MAX];
> > + static char memcg_name[PATH_MAX];
>
> I don't think we need both of these. With a bit of shuffling we could
> reuse the single buffer?
ping?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists