[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.1.10.0902061531560.22097@twin.jikos.cz>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:36:46 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: PATCH: Allow user to force 'tsc' to be treated as stable.
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Ben Greear wrote:
> Allow user to force TSC as stable clock-source. Works around BIOS issues
> in the FWA-7304 (Via CN700 chipset) system, and possibly others.
How do you know that the TSC is stable on such system? What was the reason
for kernel marking it unstable?
> diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> index ca89e15..0578fcb 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(clocksource_list);
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(clocksource_lock);
> static char override_name[32];
> static int finished_booting;
> +static int force_tsc_stable;
>
> /* clocksource_done_booting - Called near the end of core bootup
> *
> @@ -82,6 +83,14 @@ static unsigned long watchdog_resumed;
> #define WATCHDOG_INTERVAL (HZ >> 1)
> #define WATCHDOG_THRESHOLD (NSEC_PER_SEC >> 4)
>
> +static int __init parse_force_tsc_stable(char *arg)
> +{
> + force_tsc_stable = 1;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +early_param("force_tsc_stable", parse_force_tsc_stable);
Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt would also like to know about this
option.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists