[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090206154917.GE13758@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:49:17 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
hskinnemoen@...el.com, cooloney@...nel.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
ralf@...ux-mips.org, dhowells@...hat.com, matthew@....cx,
chris@...kel.net, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ia64 <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 04:45:39PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 08:59:01PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > > Jaswinder Singh Rajput (2):
> > > Neither asm/types.h nor linux/types.h is required for arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > > make linux/types.h as assembly safe
> >
> > I continue to disagree with the need for the second patch.
>
> But have not replied to my mail about that so far.
Sigh. No I didn't - because I also got a reply from Jaswinder and
covered all points in _that_ reply.
Would you like me to re-send my reply so that you can appear in the To:
header?
Stop making this discussion stupidly obtuse.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists