[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902061300540.22636@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:01:18 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/function-graph-tracer: handle the leaf functions
from trace_pipe
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> When one cat on the trace file, the leaf functions are printed without brackets:
>
> function();
>
> whereas in the trace_pipe file we'll see the following:
>
> function() {
> }
>
> This is because the ring_buffer handling is not the same between those two files.
> On the trace file, when an entry is printed, the iterator advanced and then we can
> check the next entry.
>
> There is no iterator with trace_pipe, the current entry to print has been peeked
> and not consumed. So checking the next entry will still return the current one while
> we don't consume it.
>
> This patch introduces a new value for the output callbacks to ask the tracing
> core to not consume the current entry after printing it.
> We need it because we will have to consume the current entry ourself to check the next one.
>
> Now the trace_pipe is able to handle well the leaf functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Thanks Frederic,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists