[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090207122432.GA2822@ami.dom.local>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 13:24:32 +0100
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: itvirta@....fi, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Soft lockup in sungem on Netra AC200 when switching interface
up
David Miller wrote, On 02/07/2009 07:01 AM:
> From: Ilkka Virta <itvirta@....fi>
> Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:29:02 +0200
>
>> Looking at gem_do_start() and gem_open(), it seems that the only thing
>> done while opening the device after the request_irq(), is a call to
>> napi_enable().
>>
>> I don't know what the ordering requirements are for the
>> initialization, but I boldly tried to move the napi_enable() call
>> inside gem_do_start() before the link state is checked and interrupts
>> subsequently enabled, and it seems to work for me. Doesn't even break
>> anything too obvious...
>>
>> Any ideas on how this really should be fixed?
>
> Actually your fix looks good, I'll apply this :-)
Alas it could be not enough. It seems this problem is caused by not
serving interrupts if napi is disabled. This patch added napi_enable()
on one path, but e.g. here:
static int gem_close(struct net_device *dev)
{
struct gem *gp = netdev_priv(dev);
mutex_lock(&gp->pm_mutex);
napi_disable(&gp->napi);
gp->opened = 0;
if (!gp->asleep)
gem_do_stop(dev, 0);
...
similar storm can happen if an interrupt is triggered just after
napi_disable().
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists